![not good timing synonym not good timing synonym](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/1f/ba/f9/1fbaf9621c23c9bb4ca067103aeb934a.jpg)
The first section displayed on the fact sheet is an assessment summary. The different sections of the assessment are explained in more detail below. Within each Red List assessment, supporting information is displayed in different sections, which include both text and data (there is also a Text Summary section that shows all of the assessment text in one place). Note that data that are not part of the minimum supporting information requirements may not be recorded for all taxa on The IUCN Red List.
Not good timing synonym pdf#
For some taxa, the PDF version displays a different scientific name from the one used in the fact sheet (see Taxonomic Revisions on The Red List for an explanation). The PDF version of an assessment includes the same text, data and map that is displayed in the fact sheet, except for images of the taxon and data from external sources. The map provides a quick illustration of where the species occurs, and the underlying spatial data are also used for analyses. These data contribute to justifying the placement of the taxon in a particular category, but they also allow the Red List to be analysed and for users to perform a wide range of searches on the website.ĭistribut ion map – most assessments include a distribution map. Many assessments also include data (population size, generation length, number of locations, etc.).
![not good timing synonym not good timing synonym](https://photos.travelblog.net/93228/337247/f/3016072-we-re-here-for-a-good-time-not-a-long-time-so-have-a-good-time-the-sun-can-t-shine-every-day-1.jpg)
The text justifies the placement of the taxon in a particular category and the context for conservation action.ĭata – all assessments include coded information (Red List Category, Red List Criteria, countries of occurrence, threats, habitats, conservation and research actions, etc.). Text – each assessment includes text describing the reasons for placing the taxon into a particular category, its global distribution, and what is currently known about its population, the habitats it relies on, threats, use and trade, and conservation measures. Both versions provide three general types of supporting information: Red List assessments are available as online assessments (or fact sheets), and also as PDF publications that can be downloaded from the fact sheets. The minimum and recommended supporting information requirements for assessments being submitted for publication on The IUCN Red List, and guidance on what information to include in a Red List assessment, are available in the Supporting Information Guidelines. Currently, The IUCN Red List includes assessments for over 138,300 species, most of them documented with information supporting their Red List status.
![not good timing synonym not good timing synonym](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/58/d5/be/58d5bec62408425afa4040f436890e2a.jpg)
In 2004, it became a requirement for Assessors to provide supporting information for all submitted assessments. At that time, just over 16,500 species were included on the Red List, each one with very basic information attached. In 2000, IUCN compiled all Red List assessments from the 1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals and The World List of Threatened Trees into one electronic Red List, which marked the beginning of The IUCN Red List website. It is a compendium of information detailing the current extinction risk for the animal, fungus and plant species that have been assessed to date. To further complicate matters, historians and tribal members say there are different versions of how the area came to be named “Indian Head.Supporting Information The IUCN Red List is more than just a list of species names and Red List Categories. Plus, he said, the “renaming of this highway has mixed support amongst our membership.” Some were offended by the term “Indian Head,” he wrote, while others were “concerned that the name change will erase references to ‘Indian Headlands,’ a term which was used in historical records to identify the Southern Maryland region where our people resided.” “Within our tribal community, it is very concerning that this bill was not fully vetted and that no outreach to Piscataway tribal leadership was attempted prior to being introduced,” Gray wrote in a March 30 letter. Francis Gray, who identifies himself as the tribal chair of the Piscataway Conoy council, told The Washington Post the council did not support the way the bill was introduced and passed because he felt it was “fast tracked” and no one reached out to him or the tribal council leaders until the last minute.